Rob Hill writes ("ubuntu/debian with emacspeak"): > I need to start a new machine. I'm currently using debian, and of > course find it excellent, though it was time-consuming to set up. Has > anybody any opinions as to whether I'm better off with Ubuntu, from > emacspeak users' point of view, for home pc use? In my opinion it does not make much of a difference whether you choose Debian or Ubuntu for use with emacspeak. One advantage of Ubuntu is that you can install it with only software speech and without assistance. Using grml, I think you can do the same with Debian using debootstrap, but I have never tried this. Another nice thing about ubuntu are its 6-monthly release schedule, thus you can run a fairly up to date system without much risk of major breakage. An advantage of Debian is its greater number of available packages. Both distributions have all the packages you will need to get emacspeak running, but neither has the latest version of emacspeak itself packaged as far as I know. The one in Ubuntu was especially ancient last time I checked; out of the box, Ubuntu is clearly geared towards gnome and orca as far as accessibility is concerned. Best regards, Lukas ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
If you have questions about this archive or had problems using it, please send mail to:
priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx No Soliciting!Emacspeak List Archive | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | Pre 1998