Hi, From: Tyler Spivey <tspivey@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Emacs and the modern world Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:23:57 -0700 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > How relevant is Emacs, and thus by extension emacspeak, in > today's modern world? I've been reading the Emacspeak papers, > and the entire concept of an audio user interface sounds interesting, and certainly > would sound better than the current screen readers trying to read the > screen, and not knowing anything about the content. Given all that, > FireVox and FireFox can be used with the web once they mature, > but is Emacs still a good system for working on audible user interfaces > given its age, and the possibility of alternatives existing? I think that the question for a blind user it which tasks can be performed with a tool or another. In this perspective, what can be done with firefox that cannot be done with textual browsers supported by emacspeak (or speechd-el) ? Anyway site that are not accessibles, remain not accessible : indeed when someone is blind he cannot access things like flashs or most of the js even if the browser can. According to succh remarks I am personnaly not ready to leave emacs for something else ! I have been using emacspeak from 1998 to 2004 and I am now using speechd-el (sorry for the emacspeak team, but I like my emacs to speak both english and french and speechd-el seems to be more suitable for this task !) > I'm mostly asking because Emacspeak and its alternative speechd-el are missing features > that are now standard in other systems, > such as a read from cursor to end of document that, when interrupted, > will put your cursor where the synthesizer stopped reading. Is this > just not possible to do in Emacs, or has it just not > been done before? I think it's possible to implement such a feature in emacs, and maybe in a conjunction of emacs and speech-dispatcher to obtain a more precise cursor location when stopping the speech flu. > Is emacs the only existing system that lets us advise and hook into it > while running to add the speech functionality on top of it rather than recoding > the system to speak? It is probably one of the most efficient for this purpose. I recently discuss with developpers about gnome and it doesn't seem so easy to deal with it. In my opinion, the "concurrence" comes from gnome and such systems. Pierre > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkjFl+0ACgkQTsjaYASMWKTnqgCghhmnr9B8oQ6C5QMJnWArabo4 > /VQAoIJ1DONMwDaLJCmocugmyOTYmMnG > =tyV8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the > emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a > subject of "unsubscribe" or "help" > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
If you have questions about this archive or had problems using it, please send mail to:
priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx No Soliciting!Emacspeak List Archive | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | Pre 1998