Tim--
Do you have a recommended configuration for confu? I have tried it a few times, I always end up in a situation where I get a lot of split windows on long completions, I feel like I have a misconfiguration...
Embark is ... awesome. I am discovering tons of new things from just reading through the Embark recommendations.
I am not sure if I am slow or what... but trying to get my multiple email accounts working in mu4e and similar stuff is just, incredibly painful.
> On Dec 15, 2023, at 21:13, Tim Cross (via emacspeak Mailing List) <emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> A good list to post at this time of the year where people might have the
> space to perhaps look at some of these gems.
>
> After over 25 years of using Emacs and Emacspeak, I still find new gems
> or get to better appreciate old ones.
>
> I find it interesting when I've reviewed various 'canned' emacs
> configuraitons like spacemacs, doom, prelude, etc at how often I see
> existing core emacs functionality being re-worked or wrapped in another
> layer for what feels like little actual benefit. Your reference to dired
> is a good example. I see many of these setups using things like treemacs
> instead of good old dired and I often wonder why. If you really want
> something different to dired which is a little more like other file
> browsers, you also have good old 'speedbar' which has been there for
> decades. Likewise, any of the popular navaigation aid packages are
> often just alternate wrappers around existing functionality provided by
> registers and the mark ring. I still recall my first use of wdired. Like
> my first use of ange-ftp and tramp, it was a game changer.
>
> I have actually been spending a bit of time recently in streamlining my
> emacs configuration. I've experimented with various package managers
> like straight and elget etc and I've tried out various configuration
> like spacemacs, doom, prelude, purcell's emacs.d, crafted and others and
> now I've boiled it all down to the simplist and easiest to maintain
> setup I can. I have significantly modified how I manage my emacs setup.
>
> - I now make extensive use of customize. I use to prefer my own hand
> crafted init files, but now I tend to rely heavily on customize. I do
> keep my settings in a dedicated 'custom.el' file rather than the
> default bottom of your init.el, but apart from that, it is pretty
> standard.
>
> - I use package.el and have dropped all other package managers. While I
> really like straight.el and could see some advantages with others like
> elget, the additonal overheads and maintenance I found with using
> these alternatives became hard to justify. I do tend to use
> use-package quite a bit (but leverage off the :custom stanza within
> that macro to ensure it leverages the built-in custom system).
>
> - I setup package.el such that it gives priority to GNU ELPA, then
> NONGNU elpa, then MELPA. I try hard to minimise my use of melpa, but
> need it for a couple of core packages, such as magit.
>
> - I prefer built-in or core emacs packages over external
> alternatives. For example, I use eglot rather than lsp-mode,
> project.el rather than projectile etc. It is quite amazing how eglot
> and the whole LSP stuff has simplified things for configuraiton a good
> coding environment.
>
> - I use both GNUS and mu4e for email. I like them both. I was a VM user
> for many years, but found it less useful once everything moved to an
> imap based setup (I always found VM's imap support unreliable and
> slow). I find the combination of mu4e, isync and smtp.el works well
> for me.
>
> - Really enjoying vertico, corfu and embark as the basis for my
> completions setup. I no longer use company, helm or ivy.
>
> - The biggest departure I make from standard Emacs is evil mode. I
> simply prefer modal editing and love the benefits of having an editing
> a navigation and a 'visual' mode and all the simplicity that brings
> with respect to key bindings. Despite many years (decades even) of
> standard Emacs bindings, I still missed my VI based workflow and now
> with evil mode, I have it back. It does have its own limitations and
> quirks, but it works well for me.
>
> I think that last statement is the core benefit of Emacs. I primarily
> use and love emacs because it can be the editor I want and work how I
> want rather than forcing me to work how it thinks I shold work. However,
> it also encompasses the experiemnce and originality of thousands of
> other users, providing great access to existing wheels we can learn to
> leverage.
> Emacspeak discussion list -- emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send email to:
> emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of: unsubscribe
|Full archive May 1995 - present by Year|Search the archive|
If you have questions about this archive or had problems using it, please contact us.