[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Search]

Re: Progress on soundblaster driver and comparison on dectalk versus doubletalk

To: priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Progress on soundblaster driver and comparison on dectalk versus doubletalk
From: Dave Hunt <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 06:11:43 -0500
In-Reply-To: <9801041039.AA13641@xxxxxxxxxxx> (priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx)



Greg, I made no modifications to this DoubleTalk LT, just set the rate
in Emacspeak.  Guess I'll run a time trial, as I've just "maxed" it
out.  More on this to follow.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Progress on soundblaster driver and comparison on dectalk versus doubletalk
  - From: "James R. Van Zandt" <jrv@xxxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- Re: Progress on soundblaster driver and comparison on dectalk versus doubletalk
  - From: "Greg E. Priest-Dorman" <priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Prev by Date: Re: Progress on soundblaster driver and comparison on dectalk versus doubletalk
Next by Date: Re: Speech synth's, emacspeak, and Hal 95
Prev by thread: Re: Progress on soundblaster driver and comparison on dectalk versus doubletalk
Next by thread: Re: Progress on soundblaster driver and comparison on dectalk versus doubletalk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Emacspeak Files | Subscribe | Unsubscribe