[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Search]
Re: Emacspeak 9.0
- To: Hans Zoebelein <hzo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Emacspeak 9.0
- From: Brian Sellden <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 05:52:22 -0700
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.00.9902081803430.6286-100000@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Old-Return-Path: <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 07:51:11 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-Message-ID: <"K7jVCB.A.aBC.28Cw2"@hub>
- Resent-Sender: emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Hans,
It's definately doable. I believe many distributions use
a live Linux file system on the cd during installation. One
problem is that not all PCs allow an OS to be booted
from the cd drive. Again, I think this is why many
Linux distributions come with a boot floppy.
As for it being useful - I'm not very good at these questions.
It seems to me that unless you are familiar with emacs, a trial run
with emacspeak might actually scare you off. Emacs does have
a fairly steep learning curve. I think it would be useful
for those who are technically-minded.
Brian.
>>>>> "Hans" == Hans Zoebelein <hzo@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hans> Ha, good to know. But too late! I think I have suceeded in a
Hans> nice lock out. Looks like reinstall time.
Hans> But another thing: I'm thinking about a CD-ROM which contains
Hans> a live Linux file system and Emacspeak installed ready to go.
Hans> All available synthesizers thrown in including Mbrola server,
Hans> Festival and Screader. You only would fire it up as
Hans> emacspeak.mbrola, emacspeak.dtk .. and so on.
Hans> This would enable people to try out Linux and Emacspeak
Hans> without any partitioning work. Stuff which has to be
Hans> changeable could be put into a c:\linux\etc directory.
Hans> This CD-ROM could eventualy based on RH 5.2 which seems to
Hans> have a pretty good hardware recognition.
Hans> What do you think, would such a release be a) doable and b)
Hans> useful?
Hans> Prize would be as usual about 7 USD with shipment _included_
Hans> (BTW, is there another one using the brand name Cheap Bytes?
Hans> :)
Hans> Enjoy! Hans
Hans> On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Brian Sellden wrote:
>> Hi Hans -
>>
>> You said: > If you don't want X enhancements (but it runs in the
>> Xterminal window > too!), then you'll grab emacs-nox-20.... Size
>> difference between > emacs-X11-20 and emacs-nox-20 is about 100k
>> (compressed).
>>
>> Let me echo other warnings about the no-x version of emacs. Many
>> people have had trouble using it with emacspeak. When it fails,
>> it isn't just hard to use, it becomes unusable. You'll get
>> totally locked out. Use the no-x version at your own risk.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Brian.
>>
--
---------------
Brian L. Sellden - brian@xxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.henge.com/~brian
Just another hack at Gateway
User of Emacspeak 8.0, making Unix talk.
What on earth would a man do with himself
if something did not stand in his way?
-- H.G. Wells
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or change your address send mail to
"emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
Emacspeak Files |
Subscribe |
Unsubscribe