[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Search]
Re: ViaVoice now available for Linux
- To: "Greg E. Priest-Dorman" <priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: ViaVoice now available for Linux
- From: Janina Sajka <janina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 12:05:29 -0400 (EDT)
- cc: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-Reply-To: <199905061051.GAA01636@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Old-Return-Path: <janina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 11:59:22 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-Message-ID: <"J3Hqp.A.pyB.OxbM3"@hub>
- Resent-Sender: emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
I actually think this could be most instructive. Unfortunately, I would
think it's the recognition engine designers that should be setting up the
test. Consider this. Using a speech synth will guarantee precisely the
same enumciation each and every time. If the recognition engine is any
good, therefore, it should learn the synth well enough to approach perfect
recognition. Or, is my logic faulty?
Janina Sajka, Director
Information Systems Research & Development
American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)
janina@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 6 May 1999, Greg E. Priest-Dorman wrote:
> Anyone know if ViaVoice is good at recognizing the speech from a doubletalk?
>
> I just want to set up emacspeak with viavoice input on two machines
> and stick them in 'doctor' mode...
>
> Ok, its childish, but I would still like to do it.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> --
> Greg Priest-Dorman
> priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx NO SOLICITING
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe or change your address send mail to
> "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or change your address send mail to
"emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
Emacspeak Files |
Subscribe |
Unsubscribe