Re: Up again

["T. V. Raman" <ramantv@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Please do not make assertions without verifying them.
Byte compilation definitely afects run-time speed far more than load time.
>>>>> "James" == James R Van Zandt <jrv@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    James> Brian -

    James> 1) I expect elisp files to run at the same speed
    James> after they are loaded, whether or not they were
    James> byte-compiled.  2) Debian systems keep a separate
    James> byte-compiled file for each version of emacs
    James> installed (for example: emacs19, emacs20, and
    James> xemacs20).  What distribution are you using?  3)
    James> Do you find that emacspeak works well under
    James> xemacs?  I thought emacspeak had some problem
    James> under xemacs.

    James> 		 - Jim Van Zandt

    >> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 12:13:57 -0500
    >> From: "Brian G. Powell" <bpowell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>--Say, I've got a burning question--and its simple; probably in the 
>archives; but, can't find it:
>
>Once .el files are byte-compiled into .elc files they load faster--but
>won't work in both XEmacs and GNU Emacs--the .elc files can't be
>shared--but do they run faster after start-up--I mean once
>they are loaded aren't all things equal? I realize the start-up time
>is faster; but, what about general processing.
>
>TIA

    James> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    James> To unsubscribe or change your address send mail
    James> to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a
    James> subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"

-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

      
Email:  raman@xxxxxxxxxxx
WWW:    http://cs.cornell.edu/home/raman/             
PGP:    http://cs.cornell.edu/home/raman/raman.asc 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
       To unsubscribe or change your address send mail to
"emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"