[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Search]
Forward of David Burley's reply to T.V.Raman about SourceForge
- To: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Forward of David Burley's reply to T.V.Raman about SourceForge
- From: Greg Priest-Dorman <priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:05:55 -0400
- Delivered-To: priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-To: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- List-Help: <mailto:emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
- List-Post: <mailto:emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
- Old-Return-Path: <priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:05:59 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-Message-ID: <4WZbJC.A.48G.ngOjEB@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Sender: emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: David Burley <burley@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: raman@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Jay Seirmarco <jseirmarco@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Chris Clarke <cclarke@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jacob Moorman <moorman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Users Matter: Please Make SourceForge Usable
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:05:48 -0400 (EDT)
Greetings,
The plan is to revert this change on Monday.
Thank you,
David Burley
Quality of Service Analyst, SourceForge.net
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 21:05 -0700, T. V. Raman wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Please consider reversing this
> http://digg.com/software/SourceForge_makes_getting_files_even_more_difficult
> a high priority.
>
> Sourceforge is already very difficult to use for users who cannot
> see, and the above might be the last straw with respect to users
> like myself continuing to use and support sourceforge.
>
> I consider the aove sufficiently bad that I will probably have to
> start looking for alternative sites to host the emacspeak
> project.
>
> SF has been a wonderful free service, but it might be becoming
> too *costly* in other ways.
>
> >>>>> "David" == David Burley <burley@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> David> Greetings, So you are fully appraised of the issue,
> David> here's the text from the site status page
> David> (https://www.sf.net/docs/A04):
> David>
> David> ( 2006-04-14 11:18:04 - Project CVS Service ) As of
> David> 2006-04-14 we have an estimate on when the replacement
> David> CVS hardware for the new infrastructure will
> David> arrive. As soon as we get in into our hands, we'll
> David> actively work on it, with a goal of having it online
> David> by the end of the month of April. This is a best
> David> guess, and may not get hit due to the aggressive
> David> timeline we have placed on this project. However, be
> David> assured that recovery of this service in full is our
> David> highest priority. The sync process between developer
> David> and anonymous CVS (ViewCVS, etc.) is disabled now
> David> until the new infrastructure is in place, to ensure we
> David> have maximum coverage for the small number of data
> David> corruption issues that have been detected. We
> David> understand this is sub-optimal, but strongly believe
> David> that the protection of the data is paramount.
> David>
> David> ( 2006-04-06 13:04:54 - Project CVS Service ) As
> David> result of the 2006-03-30 CVS outage, and previous CVS
> David> outages, some CVS repositories do not exist on the
> David> anonymous/ViewCVS CVS hosts. This will result in proxy
> David> errors and other various unusual results when trying
> David> to access those hosts. Once we get the CVS services
> David> into better order, we'll start the synchronization
> David> processes again and these problems will go away. Our
> David> primary concern right now is for the security and
> David> reliability of developer CVS access, after which we'll
> David> restore anonymous access.
> David>
> David> ( 2006-04-06 13:02:34 - Project CVS Service ) During
> David> the post-CVS outage system assessment from the March
> David> 30, 2006 CVS outage, we have noted a few cases of
> David> filesystem corruption on the developer CVS server. We
> David> expect that a small number of repositories are
> David> affected (likely 50 or less) by the data
> David> corruption. Accordingly, we'd like all projects to
> David> audit their CVS repository for corruption and raise
> David> any issues to us via a Confidential Support Request
> David> immediately. In order to ensure your own data
> David> integrity, we also ask that you make a backup of your
> David> working copy, and do a full checkout of your
> David> repository along-side your existing working copy, so
> David> it can remain a valid source of data for your project,
> David> should a file be found corrupt (it very well may be
> David> the most recent, applicable data, even though we have
> David> multiple other sources for the same file). In some
> David> cases, we have detected the corruption and will be
> David> contacting those projects directly via email as we
> David> move forward. While we continue to work on ensuring
> David> the data viability on the developer CVS host, we are
> David> also continuing our progress with the replacement
> David> infrastructure for CVS. The new hardware order has
> David> been placed and we are concurrently preparing the
> David> technology and software components needed to make the
> David> transition to the new infrastructure. Again, we thank
> David> you for your patience and cooperation while we do
> David> everything we can to safegaurd your data.
> David>
> David> ( 2006-04-04 15:09:16 - Project CVS Service ) On
> David> 2006-04-04 at 14:15 Pacific developer CVS services
> David> were re-enabled after replacement of the failed
> David> hardware, successful completion of a full host backup,
> David> and a cursory data validity check on the host. As a
> David> precaution, we have not re-enabled the sync between
> David> anonymous pserver/ViewCVS and the developer CVS
> David> host. We anticipate that the sync's along with tarball
> David> generation will be re-enabled on Friday. Any issues
> David> found with CVS services over the following 7 days
> David> should be reported to the Confidential Support Queue.
> David>
> David> ( 2006-04-03 14:04:56 - Project CVS Service ) As an
> David> update to the 2006-03-30 CVS outage, our current
> David> estimate is that CVS services will be back online
> David> (developer access) late Tuesday or early Wednesday
> David> (Pacific Timezone).
> David>
> David> ( 2006-04-03 05:55:21 - Project CVS Service ) On
> David> 2006-03-30 the developer CVS server had a substantial
> David> system failure. Due to the implementation of the CVS
> David> service, there is a single point of failure with
> David> multiple points of recovery (there is more than one
> David> data source we could potentially recover from if there
> David> is any data loss as a result of the failure). This
> David> outage currently affects developer CVS access
> David> directly, but we have disabled tarball updates and
> David> data syncs from the developer CVS server to the
> David> anonymous pserver/ViewCVS hosts as an additional level
> David> of precaution. Our main focus since the outage was
> David> detected has been to safegaurd all data on the
> David> developer CVS server as well as possible. We are
> David> currently attempting to backup the data on the host,
> David> which is taking longer than we initially anticipated
> David> it would, but is a necessary step to fully safegaurd
> David> the host's data. Next, we are going to perform some
> David> data validation to ensure the data set appears
> David> valid. Pending successful completion of those steps,
> David> we'll reenable developer CVS access. A few days after,
> David> we'll reenable CVS tarballs and syncs to anonymous
> David> CVS. In the mean time, we're currently advancing plans
> David> for a CVS architecture change based upon the knowledge
> David> we gained during Subversion deployment to eliminate
> David> the single point of failure that developer CVS
> David> currently has, add horizontal scalability and overall
> David> service resiliance. However, we still do not have an
> David> estimate on when developer CVS services will be
> David> restored, but we have been, and currently are actively
> David> working to restore access to CVS. We appreciate your
> David> patience with us while we work to properly resolve
> David> this major outage.
> David>
> David> ( 2006-03-31 07:00:01 - Project CVS Service ) On
> David> 2006-03-30 the developer CVS server had a hardware
> David> issue that required us to take the service offline. We
> David> are actively working on this problem and hope to have
> David> it back up soon. There is not a current estimate for
> David> the duration of this outage, but when we get one, it
> David> will be posted on the site status page (this page). We
> David> currently expect this outage to last 48 hours, at
> David> minimum.
> David>
> David>
> David>
> David> The basic gist of it is, that anonymous CVS will be
> David> down until we get the new infrastructure up. We
> David> believe the hosts will be delivered to us next week,
> David> and we have already started the development of the
> David> software pieces needed to implement it. The current
> David> hope is to have it done by the end of this week, but
> David> as we don't have the hardware yet, it may take until
> David> the first week of may to resolve.
> David>
> David> That said, as the tracker is not usable to you, do not
> David> hesitate to contact me directly via this manner. While
> David> I don't like the general populous to do this, as that
> David> would certainly inundate me with email traffic, I
> David> definitely don't mine hearing from you directly on any
> David> matters. The site is not optimized for the blind, but
> David> I and we support your efforts to make software easier
> David> to use for the blind. Hopefully we can change that as
> David> we move forward, but stability and service
> David> availability are the top concerns at the moment.
> David>
> David> So, please do not hesitate to contact me directly with
> David> your concerns.
> David>
> David> Thank you,
> David>
> David> David Burley Quality of Service Analyst,
> David> SourceForge.net
> David>
> David>
> David> On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 08:24 -0700, T. V. Raman wrote:
> >> David, Could you look into this for us? It appears that
> >> anon cvs has not been getting updated for a while ---
> >> looks like it has not been receiving updates after the cvs
> >> meltdown at Sourceforge a couple of weeks ago. i
> >> apologize for not using SF's Web interface to report the
> >> problem, but as I've mentioned in the past, that setup is
> >> well-nigh impossible to use if you cannot see.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your help. email message attachment,
> >> "forwarded message" On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 08:24 -0700,
> >> T. V. Raman wrote: > Hi Raman,
> >> >
> >> > I stil cannot see the changes to emacspeak-m-player.el
> >> or any other > changes in the anonymous CVS. I believe
> >> this goes beyond a normal > delay. The anonymous CVs
> >> appears to be locked at a state from maybe 2 > weeks ago.
> >> >
> >> > Best regards, Lukas
> David> -- David Burley Quality of Service Analyst,
> David> SourceForge.net burley@xxxxxxxxxxx
> David>
> David>
> David>
> David>
> David> **************************************************************************
> David> This email may contain confidential and privileged
> David> material for the sole use of the intended recipient.
> David> Any review or distribution by others is strictly
> David> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> David> please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> David> ***************************************************************************
>
> Thanks,
> --Raman
>
--
David Burley
Quality of Service Analyst, SourceForge.net
burley@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the
emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a
subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
Emacspeak Files |
Subscribe |
Unsubscribe | Search