[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Search]
Re: emacspeak versus commercial software
- To: "Patrick Gordon" <pcgordon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: emacspeak versus commercial software
- From: "T. V. Raman" <raman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 07:55:33 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <000801c1b6ac$d97a8500$aab41e42@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 11:03:43 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-Message-ID: <"0BVJ_.A.5oB.aEob8"@hub>
- Resent-Sender: emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
So use the free jaws demo on the $250.0 P90.
That's a rip-off though because you can buy a fully
configured Linux box at Frys this week for $249.0--
700mhz processor, 20gb hard-drive and 128mb RAM.
So the choice is yours.
And there is even less in this for me than you.>>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Gordon <pcgordon@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Patrick> Raman, Please do not read this as criticism. I
Patrick> am merely looking for a critical analysis of
Patrick> emacspeak versus commercial software. Jason
Patrick> provided exactly the type of information I am
Patrick> looking for (though I have not yet fully
Patrick> digested his comments). I have not been able
Patrick> to get this software to work on two PCs so far.
Patrick> The first one was a P90 with only 32 MB that
Patrick> would have cost $250 just to add the additional
Patrick> required memory. This second one is a laptop
Patrick> whose soundcard does not pass muster. Yet, the
Patrick> free Jaws demo works on both of these systems
Patrick> as is, so for me, emacspeak is a more expensive
Patrick> alternative. It is not a case of me being
Patrick> disappointed with linux, and I certainly do not
Patrick> want to waste anybody's time arguing over which
Patrick> is better. I am just trying to determine where
Patrick> I should expend my effort. Heck, there is
Patrick> absolutely nothing in this for me personnaly.
Patrick> ----- Original Message ----- From:
Patrick> "T. V. Raman" <raman@xxxxxxxxxxx> To:
Patrick> <jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Patrick
Patrick> Gordon" <pcgordon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "emacspeak"
Patrick> <emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday,
Patrick> February 16, 2002 12:01 AM Subject: Re:
Patrick> emacspeak versus commercial software
>> Also I suspect a major red herring here.
>>
> Some wires may have gotten crossed with messages on the
> list:
>
> Originally Greg and others had pointed Patrick at irqtune as
> a means of setting IRQ priorities.
>
> Later I also said "it's probably due to bad IRQ settings"--
> but I was not refering to tuning IRQ priorities --but to set
> the right IRQs for that sound card.
>
> Patrick --if you're disappointed with Linux and feel it's a
> waste of your time to debug your troubles, by all means get
> MS Windows and a screenreader --let's not waste band-width
> and breath arguing over what may or may not be better.
>
> The situation you are hitting is basically a sound card that
> you have that is not fully supported or functional on Linux;
> you have the option of:
> If you wish to run Linux:
>
> A getting a sound card that works with Linux
> B Getting a hardware synth;
> or
> Alternatively abandon your Linux efforts.
>
> >>>>> "Jason" == Jason White <jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> Jason> Patrick Gordon writes:
> >> I have put in many hours trying to build a demo of a useful
Patrick> text-to-speech
>> >> tool for my blind friend. At this point, I feel
>> it necessary to do
Patrick> a sanity
>> > check on this listserv. Today, I came to the
>> conclusion that irqtune,
Patrick> a
>> > vital tool needed to make emacspeak functional on
>> my system, will not
Patrick> work
>> > with RH 7.2. The binary is nonfunctional on 7.2 and the c source code
>> > requires compiler extensions not supported in the RH 7.2 distribution.
>
> Jason> This is odd; surely it will compile with gcc
> Jason> 2.95.x or gcc 3.0.x? Or is a needed library
> Jason> missing?
>
> Jason> I would suggest ensuring that your compiler is up
> Jason> to date and that any necessary libraries are
> Jason> installed. If it still doesn't work, the next
> Jason> step is to contact the developers to find out
> Jason> whether a patch is available that would overcome
> Jason> your problem.
>
>
Jason> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick> --------
Jason> To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change
Jason> Jason> your address on the emacspeak list send mail to
> Jason> "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject
> Jason> of "unsubscribe" or "help"
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> --raman
>
>
> Email: raman@xxxxxxxxxxx
> WWW: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/raman/
> AIM: TVRaman
> PGP: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/raman/raman.asc
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick> ---
>> To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the
>> emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a
> subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
>^^ݳI_jfrzYyۖYo0,+en&{ڙ MTZ0,+en&{ڙ
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the
emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a
subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"