[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Search]
Emacspeak And Software Dectalk
- To: raman@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Emacspeak And Software Dectalk
- From: Tim Cross <tcross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 18:18:16 +1000
- In-Reply-To: <16562.49614.646023.973822@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 04:21:47 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-Message-ID: <"14WSr.A.PEH.5EwsAB"@hub>
- Resent-Sender: emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
I use the software dectalk at home and the dectalk express hardware
synth at work.
I purchased the 6.41 versin when it was first made available and then
the version 5 when it came out.
After fixing some minor problems with the tcldtk.c file and the
dtk-soft script, version 5 is now working and working a lot better
than version 641 use to (volume better, responsiveness problems under
Debian are gone).
I also use various other software synths and have a working, but buggy
version of Cepstral's speech server working with emacspeak.
While I really like the quality of the Cepstral voices, a single voice
costs about the same as the dectalk software and the dectalk has
multiple voice support. I also find Cepstral's voice does not work as
well at high speaking rates - it loses clarity at higher speeds while
the software dectalk seems better at handling higher speeds.
All in all, I think the sftware dectalk is probably the best value for
a clear and versatile software speech synthesizer for
emacspeak. Nothing seems to havve the clarity and reliability of Via
voice, which I miss very much. I would not like to see support for the
software dectalk dropped.
Raman, can I ask what do you use for a software synthesizer or do you
only use hardware synths?
Tim
>>>>> "tvr" == T V Raman <tvraman@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
tvr> I'd like to conduct a brief survey on the Emacspeak list to see
tvr> if it is worthwhile to continue the support for Software
tvr> Dectalk. The Dectalk has been my favorite TTS engine for a long
tvr> time, but the reason I'm asking is to see if the number of users
tvr> it has justifies the time investment.
tvr> Last I checked around the time of the DTK 5.0 release John
tvr> Oelfke of Fonix indicated that they had less than 25 software
tvr> Dectalk customers for Emacspeak --- and if that is indeed the
tvr> number, I for one think it's time to drop it.
tvr> If you are interested in seeing Software Dectalk support
tvr> continue in Emacspeak, please follow-up to this note so you get
tvr> counted --- with answers to the following:
tvr> 0) Do you use the software Dectalk with Emacspeak? 1) When did
tvr> you buy it (approx date)
tvr> Please follow-up to this note so that your message goes to both
tvr> the emacspeak list and John Oelfke And if there are indeed a
tvr> very small number, I can safely drop support for it. This is of
tvr> course not to discourage other folks who may want to pick up
tvr> maintaining that code going forward independent of what we find
tvr> out as we count up the numbers.
tvr> --Raman
tvr> -- Best Regards, --raman
tvr> Email: raman@xxxxxxxxxxx WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
tvr> AIM: TVRaman PGP:
tvr> http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc IRC:
tvr> irc://irc.gnu.org/emacspeak
tvr> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
tvr> To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on
tvr> the emacspeak list send mail to
tvr> "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of
tvr> "unsubscribe" or "help"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the
emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a
subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"