[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Search]
Emacspeak And Software Dectalk
- To: "\"Tim Cross\"" <tcross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Emacspeak And Software Dectalk
- From: "Bruce" <chester02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 08:31:33 -0400
- Reply-To: "Bruce" <chester02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 08:35:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-Message-ID: <"gpLDn.A.XU.OzzsAB"@hub>
- Resent-Sender: emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Tim!
Do you have a write-up of your fix for 5.0? It would be nice to forward it to the list if it is for Emacspeak.
Also, I had talked with a North Carolina university software tech in their disability department and they are not even aware of the Fonix Dectalk soft Syn and I had mentioned this to John when I spoke on the phone when ordering the Dectalk soft syn. I sense either poor advertising or simply lack of knowledge to those who could in fact use it in the future. How many other universities are not aware?
And it is true that Flight needs a lot of work for understandability and no other syn out there that I am aware of is in as many languages as Dectalk and as understandable, which is number one in computer programming for the blind to break down the barriers.
I think more should be done, besides Cornell University is using Linux now in Ithaca New York and Python programming language for all there analyses, so I find it very foolish to give up now. The bible teacher of our church is in fact in charge of the department that is doing government research and the Linux/Python platform.
Linux is the future and those first in the field will have the advantage and Emacspeak and Dectalk is the best we have for the blind when Linux is first choice over Windows in the future.
I just want you to know and would like Tim to post his fix.
Bruce
I use the software dectalk at home and the dectalk express hardware
synth at work.
I purchased the 6.41 versin when it was first made available and then
the version 5 when it came out.
After fixing some minor problems with the tcldtk.c file and the
dtk-soft script, version 5 is now working and working a lot better
than version 641 use to (volume better, responsiveness problems under
Debian are gone).
I also use various other software synths and have a working, but buggy
version of Cepstral's speech server working with emacspeak.
While I really like the quality of the Cepstral voices, a single voice
costs about the same as the dectalk software and the dectalk has
multiple voice support. I also find Cepstral's voice does not work as
well at high speaking rates - it loses clarity at higher speeds while
the software dectalk seems better at handling higher speeds.
All in all, I think the sftware dectalk is probably the best value for
a clear and versatile software speech synthesizer for
emacspeak. Nothing seems to havve the clarity and reliability of Via
voice, which I miss very much. I would not like to see support for the
software dectalk dropped.
Raman, can I ask what do you use for a software synthesizer or do you
only use hardware synths?
Tim
>>>>> "tvr" == T V Raman <tvraman@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
tvr> I'd like to conduct a brief survey on the Emacspeak list to see
tvr> if it is worthwhile to continue the support for Software
tvr> Dectalk. The Dectalk has been my favorite TTS engine for a long
tvr> time, but the reason I'm asking is to see if the number of users
tvr> it has justifies the time investment.
tvr> Last I checked around the time of the DTK 5.0 release John
tvr> Oelfke of Fonix indicated that they had less than 25 software
tvr> Dectalk customers for Emacspeak --- and if that is indeed the
tvr> number, I for one think it's time to drop it.
tvr> If you are interested in seeing Software Dectalk support
tvr> continue in Emacspeak, please follow-up to this note so you get
tvr> counted --- with answers to the following:
tvr> 0) Do you use the software Dectalk with Emacspeak? 1) When did
tvr> you buy it (approx date)
tvr> Please follow-up to this note so that your message goes to both
tvr> the emacspeak list and John Oelfke And if there are indeed a
tvr> very small number, I can safely drop support for it. This is of
tvr> course not to discourage other folks who may want to pick up
tvr> maintaining that code going forward independent of what we find
tvr> out as we count up the numbers.
tvr> --Raman
tvr> -- Best Regards, --raman
tvr> Email: raman@xxxxxxxxxxx WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
tvr> AIM: TVRaman PGP:
tvr> http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc IRC:
tvr> irc://irc.gnu.org/emacspeak
tvr> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
tvr> To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on
tvr> the emacspeak list send mail to
tvr> "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of
tvr> "unsubscribe" or "help"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the
emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a
subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the
emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a
subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"