[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Search]
Re: Software Speech (Re: ibm tts run-time engine purchasing alternatives)
- To: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Software Speech (Re: ibm tts run-time engine purchasing alternatives)
- From: "Robert D. Crawford" <rdc1x@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:41:24 -0600
- Delivered-To: priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-To: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20060216091421.02f9fd10@xxxxxxxxxxx> (JohnG. Heim's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:58:26 -0600")
- List-Help: <mailto:emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
- List-Post: <mailto:emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
- Old-Return-Path: <rdc1x@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:46:08 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-Message-ID: <vsnxOB.A.bhH.QxK9DB@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Sender: emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
"John G. Heim" <jheim@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>as for the long pauses before the speech begins, yes, I was surprised
>>too. the Festival synth works by emacspeak passing the whole
>>document, or at best a whole paragraph, off to the synth server and
>>then waiting for a sound file to be returned. The WAV is then queued
>>on the DSP device for playback. Once playback begins, there is no
>>means to abort. The Java synth, mbrola and flite all work the same
>> way
>>(using the same code); I don't understand why they'd want to use a
>>system like that, and I do question if anyone really seriously does
>>use it.
I can't speak for anything else, but I do know that when I was using
flite under emacspeak I would regularly read long buffers with C-e n and
when I had to interrupt the speech, I did not have a problem. I do
seem to remember having this sort of problem, but it was about 8 months
ago and I think I was trying speech dispatcher.
> I know flight works fairly well with emacspeak. Although I've never
> installed it, I have used it quite a bit.
I can second this. In the short amount of time I have been using the
via voice tts, I have found that the only advantage it has over flite is
the multiple voice support. If you are a developer it is definitely
worth it. I never really had a problem with the voice quality, and as a
mater of fact, it did take me a bit of time to get used to the difference in voices
between the two. I did have one other problem that I have not seen
mentioned and that is the speed up in the output during heavy scrolling
and when passing over urls. I eventually got used to it.
> You're thinking, "How is that possible?" I have used flight and oralux
> quite a bit.
Sometime in the future, there will be a version of Oralux available with
the viavoice tts engine. Boot it and test it out without the pain of
installation... should be pretty cool.
rdc
--
<=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=>
Robert D. Crawford rdc1x@xxxxxxxxxxx
You have an unusual equipment for success. Be sure to use it properly.
<=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=><=>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the
emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a
subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
Emacspeak Files |
Subscribe |
Unsubscribe | Search