[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Search]
Re: Software Speech (Re: ibm tts run-time engine purchasingalternatives)
- To: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Software Speech (Re: ibm tts run-time engine purchasingalternatives)
- From: "John G. Heim" <jheim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:58:26 -0600
- Delivered-To: priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-To: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <m23bikm50x.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-Help: <mailto:emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
- List-Post: <mailto:emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
- Old-Return-Path: <jheim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:58:59 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: emacspeak@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-Message-ID: <XgNpD.A.x6F.DFK9DB@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resent-Sender: emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
>Yeah, probably a throttle back isn't a bad idea, but the Accent SA
>cost us $60 and it was flushed down the tubes because of false
>promises in the emacspeak docs /and/ the mailing list. Sure, it's
>only $60, but that's not a trivial amount of money around here. My
>friend survives on disability and whatever he can make as a gospel
>songwriter.
Have you investigated whether speakup supports that synth? I use both
emacspeak and speakup. I probably use emacspeak more just because I've
always used emacspeak. But I have also been very impressed with speakup.
>as for the long pauses before the speech begins, yes, I was surprised
>too. the Festival synth works by emacspeak passing the whole
>document, or at best a whole paragraph, off to the synth server and
>then waiting for a sound file to be returned. The WAV is then queued
>on the DSP device for playback. Once playback begins, there is no
>means to abort. The Java synth, mbrola and flite all work the same way
>(using the same code); I don't understand why they'd want to use a
>system like that, and I do question if anyone really seriously does
>use it.
I know flight works fairly well with emacspeak. Although I've never
installed it, I have used it quite a bit. You're thinking, "How is that
possible?" I have used flight and oralux quite a bit. I don't know if
you're familiar with oralux but it rocks. It's a live CD (ie bootable).
I'm not sure about everything it supports but when I get really stuck with
a piece of hardware, I usually try booting with oralux into flight and
emacspeak. I would say that around 80% of the machines I've tried it on
have come up talking. I mean, I've trashed the operating system on some
machine and have been able to repair them via oralux.
When I first started working here at the math department at the U of
Wisconsin, I couldn't have done my job w/o oralux which depends on
emacspeak. I had to build a bunch of dual-bboot machines. I could do a
network install of Windows but first I had to fdisk the hard drive.
Otherwise, Windows would slurp up the whole HD and there would be no space
for linux. I don't know how I'd have done that without oralux.
I guess maybe I could have built aknoppix CD with a tty on ttyS0 or
something. But by the time I got that done I' might not havehad a job.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the
emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a
subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
Emacspeak Files |
Subscribe |
Unsubscribe | Search