Emacspeak discussion list

[Robert Melton <lists AT robertmelton.com>]

Raman--

Responses inline below, with some additional after. 

> On Mar 6, 2024, at 11:25, T.V Raman (via emacspeak Mailing List) 
> <emacspeak AT emacspeak.net> wrote:
> 
> 2. My initial thought a week ago was that they should; now I'm
>   questioning that

I don't think my PR should be used. The unidirectional part of it really 
lowers the value. There is a way to work around this I will talk about 
later. 

> 3. The initial issue likely is not useful to have on the list.
> 4. Follow-up discussion if they get long ought to get archived.

I think in a bidirectional manner it could have value, that way people
on the list could respond back to an issue, even maybe solve it then 
the user could close it. 

> 6. Tim/Greg -- it would involve one of you doing some work.

Tim/Greg would not be required, you could technically setup a new 
address someaddress AT example.com and register it with the list then
setup the smtp settings to use that account, would land on the list. 

> 7. If we start follow-up discussion on a Github Issue, we just add
>   emacspeak AT emacspeak.net to the CC field.

Fair alternative, another one is simply turning off issues and making 
it clear they should come to the list.  

> But I wonder if its worth the effort for now; easier solution:
> 8.

So, another way is to make github allowed to send directly 
to the list. You register the list address as one of your personal 
email addresses on github, setup just issues on the project to 
send by email and have them send to the list.  That would let
the list reply in a bi-directional manner and have a back and 
forth with the ticket.  

----

Crazy thought: maybe sourcehut (sr.ht) is worth some consideration.
Mailing list / mail git workflow, generally very accessible web interfaces
but the founding idea is do everything with email.

--
Robert "robertmeta" Melton
lists AT robertmelton.com