Hi Steve, On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:14:25AM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > Out of curiousity, if portaudio is the culprate with espeak, can one > merely compile espeak now and leave portaudio out completely? I > thought espeak depended on it internally to even compile. Can one > clarify? I might be interested in evaluating pulse again if things are > all that much better now. Unfortunately, espeak requires either portaudio or pulseaudio to compile. No one has written a back end that allows it to use alsa directly. William
Attachment:
pgpTqTM6DcUBH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
If you have questions about this archive or had problems using it, please send mail to:
priestdo@xxxxxxxxxxx No Soliciting!Emacspeak List Archive | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | Pre 1998