Emacspeak discussion list

["T.V Raman" <raman AT google.com>]

My advice would be to not doing the spatialization by hand, the
platform if it does it is likely already optimized.



Robert Melton writes:
 > 1. Yeah, going to experiment a bit, right now my latency changes seem
 > to be in the 130ms to 230ms range from turning on spacial audio. Which 
 > at first testing seems acceptable to me, but I am on high end hardware. 
 > 
 > I might experiment with doing it manually, but the spatial engine has
 > a nice upside of protecting me from any Apple format changes as it is 
 > attached to the player which will always support Apples internal format
 > Core Audio. 
 > 
 > 2. With Swiftmac 2.0 -- it tracks far more like the other servers 
 > handling the queue as expected, I did some silly stuff with swiftmac 1.0 
 > due to not really understanding some of the clever stuff emacspeak already
 > does for you, so swiftmac 2 is way better at handling like bulk outputs 
 > from eshell.
 > 
 > > On Mar 27, 2024, at 10:09, T.V Raman <raman AT google.com> wrote:
 > > 
 > > Nice!
 > > 
 > > 1. Do  your latency concerns  stem from cycles needed to spatialize? If 
 > > yes, it's moot on today's machines.
 > > 2. Re the queue -- note that emacspeak does clause splitting based on
 > >   major-mode etc and so each element of the queue should be spoken
 > >   ie sent to the TTS engine by itself.
 > > 3. I think you're already doing this, but just making sure.
 > > 
 > > --
 > 
 > --
 > Robert "robertmeta" Melton
 > lists AT robertmelton.com

--